Solidarity or conflict?

The nineteenth century bequeathed two opposing models of how nature works. The most influential version is a certain interpretation of Darwin’s Origin of Species characterized by Herbert Spencer. It emphasizes individual competition and frames nature as like a gladiatorial battle for survival, “whereby the strongest, the swiftest, and the cunningest live to fight another day” (Spencer, 1888). Spencer was influenced by Thomas Malthus, who mistakenly predicted that population growth would lead to global catastrophe. Common to both ideologies is an assumption of scarcity rather than abundance.

Peter Kropotkin offers a very different way of understanding nature. Kropotkin is probably best known for his anarchist ideas, but he was also an influential scientist. He did extensive fieldwork in Siberia and North-east Asia and identified many examples of cooperation between animals. For Kropotkin “survival of the fittest” didn’t refer to the toughest and meanest individual, but to the community that learnt to work together. He called this mutual aid, and he concluded that it was empathy that underpinned this behaviour. Mutual aid sprang up spontaneously across the globe during the Covid-19 pandemic and at the time of writing, there are 2065 groups listed on the UK mutual aid website.

Cover of the book, 'Mutual Aid'

These two very different ways of seeing the world seem to be playing out on the world stage: On one side we see Putin’s imperialist war which implicitly assumes that might is right. Meanwhile, Berlin is preparing beds for 20,000 Ukrainian refugees. Which wins, solidarity or conflict?

Kropotkin didn’t deny that competitive struggle has a role in natural selection but argued that mutual aid was more important. Although there is conflict amidst various species, “there is perhaps even more … mutual support, mutual aid, and mutual defence … Sociability is as much a law of nature as mutual struggle” (Kropotkin, 1902).

I’m saddened that Kropotkin’s insights aren’t more widely implemented. Instead of emphasizing the value of mutual aid, the prevalent ideology of the Global South prioritises individualism. This doesn’t nurture our well-being or indeed our basic humanity. Moreover, it may ultimately lead to total climate collapse. But we have a choice and mutual aid is both intellectually satisfying and life-enhancing.

Please follow and like us:

3 thoughts on “Solidarity or conflict?

  1. It is a sad irony that much recent research in biology and how evolution works supports Kropotkin’s emphasizing cooperation over competititon. from Lynn Margulis’s work on endosymbiosis to E. O. Wilson’s work on Eusocial animals to Suzanne Simard’s work on forest life, it is clear Kropotkin saw what too many less perceptive biologists have yet to see.

  2. Biologists are finding more and more evidence of mutual aid as research progress. Kropotkin was way ahead of his time and has much to teach us today.

  3. Two friends of mine are heading to Ukraine to support those in need. Meanwhile, ‘Homes for Ukraine’ launches in the UK. These are all great examples of mutual aid. Big love to Mark Walsh, who’s taking trauma education and resilience training to Ukraine, and Seth BillybobRay Jr Kirton who’s taking medical and food supplies. Massive respect guys!

Leave a Reply